Home  / Attention : Below info is page content which Arbitrators will be able to view 24/7 (in real time) but not edit

Arbitration - Current Case: ST-ARB-CASE#7910-4 ( SD : 04/18/15 - EDL : 05/30/15 ) SD= starting date, EDL= expected date legal opinion

    e-Court - the first online court in Canada     e-Court - the first online court in Canada         ** PLEASE DESCRIBE THIS IMAGE **     e-Court - the first online court in Canada     e-Court - the first online court in Canada

Legend ( left to right ) :

  • Plaintiff # IN-CAN#7910 : Huibert  Arnold
  • Counsel for the Plaintiff IN-CAN#7568 : Peter.J.Dorney
  • The Arbitrator AR-CAN#556 : The Honourable Justice Mr. Dev Richard
  • Counsel for the Defender : NA ( Not applicable )
  • Defender IN-CAN#5731 : Justin Taylor


    •   Click Links :  *Case Overview, *Start Your Dossier, *Preparation of Case, *Processing of Dossiers, *Preparation of Response, *Hearing Case, *Week of Reflection, *Decision by the Arbitrator

        My Case / Dossier - CASE OVERVIEW prepared by the ONTARIO Court Clerk
    • 1Step 1
    • 2Step 2
    • 3Step 3
    • 4Step 4


    Name : Huibert  Arnold                                         Dossier Number : ST-ARB-CASE#7910-4

    Step 1 - General Information

    Arbitrator / Judge presiding : The Honourable Justice Mr.  

    Party #1 ( Plaintiff : Huibert  Arnold )

    Email info@e-court.ca
    City & Province Ottawa, Ontario

    Counsel of Part #1 ( Peter.J.Dorney )

    Email peter@dorney.ca
    City & Province Toronto, Ontario

    Party #2 ( IN-CAN#5731 : Justin Taylor )

    Email justin@taylor.ca
    City & Province Fredericton, Ontario

    Counsel of Part #2 ( )

    Email
    City & Province , Ontario

    Hearing will take place during week # 4

    City & Province Ottawa, Ontario
    Address 15 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ont. K4F7B9
    Date & Time 14/06/15 at 14.00 pm

    Step 2 - Claim

    Claim

    C$ info@e-court.ca

    Description by Part #1 ( Claimant )

    Sed aliquam orci non ante congue mollis. Curabitur libero libero, sodales et fermentum vitae, sollicitudin ac orci. Sed ut sapien lectus, id consectetur turpis. Sed consectetur felis eu augue ultrices ullamcorper.

    Description by Part #2 ( Defendant )

    Ut ante ligula, rhoncus non eleifend a, posuere at purus. Vestibulum posuere posuere metus, in facilisis diam sollicitudin in. Morbi adipiscing eleifend erat ut elementum. Maecenas at dui quis justo rutrum interdum et a tortor. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Phasellus interdum commodo cursus.

    Step 3 - Case Part #1 ( Plaintiff )

    Claim

    Additional description of case

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras vestibulum ultricies risus at porttitor. Aliquam eget porta dui. Ut imperdiet sem in dolor malesuada laoreet.

    Facts to support the claim

    In purus diam, condimentum at faucibus eu, tempus sed lectus. Vivamus nulla massa, ullamcorper a lacinia eget, pharetra ac mauris. Sed aliquam orci non ante congue mollis. Curabitur libero libero, sodales et fermentum vitae, sollicitudin ac orci.

    Judicial support

    Sed ut sapien lectus, id consectetur turpis. Sed consectetur felis eu augue ultrices ullamcorper. Phasellus non blandit massa.

    Facts both parties agree upon

    Proin non elit eu ipsum porta pellentesque. Phasellus sed vestibulum justo. Pellentesque lectus felis, dignissim egestas tempor in, sollicitudin a sapien. Etiam euismod tortor a orci fermentum id imperdiet ligula placerat. Morbi interdum dictum malesuada.

    Facts both parties do not agree upon

    Nunc at lectus quis augue dapibus cursus lacinia elementum lorem. Sed sagittis libero eget velit euismod et posuere magna consectetur. Cras accumsan dolor ut risus convallis et vestibulum purus sodales. Donec hendrerit mauris id diam tempus sit amet vestibulum nisl tincidunt. Vivamus dolor justo, gravida et laoreet pulvinar, dictum ac augue.

    Response to input other party

    Vestibulum id sodales dolor. Mauris arcu elit, mollis quis cursus sit amet, consequat vel turpis.

    Documentary evidence of the allegations

    Sollicitudin ac orci

    Relevant articles of law, jurisprudence and literature

    Curabitur a massa eget orci fringilla ornare in id turpis. Phasellus a magna turpis. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Vestibulum risus mauris, sodales congue suscipit quis, aliquet sit amet magna.

    Step 4 - Case Part #2 ( Defendant )

    Detailed description of the case

    Aenean pellentesque, felis at porttitor accumsan, ligula nibh faucibus quam, eget pellentesque est dui non libero.

    Facts to support the claim

    Mauris a lorem ullamcorper justo tempor fringilla. Quisque erat nibh, pharetra ut accumsan ac, venenatis non mi. Suspendisse non felis in nibh consectetur aliquam. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

    Judicial support

    Ut ante ligula, rhoncus non eleifend a, posuere at purus. Vestibulum posuere posuere metus, in facilisis diam sollicitudin in.

    Facts both parties agree upon

    Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Phasellus interdum commodo cursus.

    Facts both parties do not agree upon

    Donec lectus elit, cursus eget venenatis ac, convallis ac tortor. Fusce nulla velit, dictum ac tincidunt quis, malesuada eget erat. Nulla sed arcu eu justo malesuada cursus a ac turpis.

    Response to input other party

    ed dui nulla, fermentum congue commodo nec, bibendum a ante. Etiam sollicitudin accumsan adipiscing. Cras magna eros, consectetur in sagittis vitae, ullamcorper eu tortor. Nulla quis risus massa, a mattis nibh.

    Documentary evidence of the allegations

    Nulla facilisi

    Relevant articles of law, jurisprudence and literature

    Morbi adipiscing eleifend erat ut elementum. Maecenas at dui quis justo rutrum interdum et a tortor. Nulla facilisi.